Kill Bill Vol. 2

**ACID** · 31st December 2003

pictures & trailer

http://www.empiremovies.com/movies/2004/kill_bill.shtml

nothing unexpected, looks good

**Tattooed Freak** · 2nd January 2004

I still haven't seen Volume 1! Must make the effort to see it, the 2nd one look's good.

**TheOneNOnly** · 4th January 2004

Personally was disapppointed for a Tarentino film.
Will prob be able 5 parts though.

**Scarface2003** · 1st February 2004

Kill Bill 1 was an excellent movie - can't wait for part 2. Its should just as good, if not better with a few added twists.

Scarface

**Mr.James** · 1st February 2004

Kil Bill v1 was the best film of 2003 by far. he's the only director with any original ideas and style nowadays

**[Slip]** · 1st February 2004

pretty broad statement!!

cohen bros?

**Shotgunjim** · 1st February 2004

Originally Posted by Mr.James

Kil Bill v1 was the best film of 2003 by far. he's the only director with any original ideas and style nowadays

Hmmm ROTK???

You say that he is groundbreaking but he is just making his style of film... Pulp Fiction was groundbreaking, Kill Bill is just new...

**bugnote** · 2nd February 2004

i think that taking genres with a relatively small following and merging them for the mass market would be a better way of describing the tarantino style, and thank God he does it so well........roll on 2!

**Mr.James** · 2nd February 2004

Originally Posted by [Slip

]pretty broad statement!!

cohen bros?

Not really rated much of their stuff. Fargo's probably my favourite film that I've seen of theirs but that doesn't include their most recent stuff.

Originally Posted by Shotgunjim

Hmmm ROTK???

You say that he is groundbreaking but he is just making his style of film... Pulp Fiction was groundbreaking, Kill Bill is just new...

ROTK!!! Groundbreaking? Far from it. Surely it's just the 'newest' of the three??? IMO it was the poorest of the three films. Like they spent all the budget on the previous two but knew everyone would go and see it no matter what. They knew they didn't have to try as hard... There was a good few places where I thought the CGI wasn't up to the previous standards. Mismatched contrast, different colours from scene to scene etc...

I didn't say QT was ground breaking, just he had original style and content. He stands out from all the hollywood regulars who churn out the same formulated shite year in year out. He's the only one that tells a story that has you wondering what's gonna happen rather than working the plot out 5 minutes in.

Isn't it strange though how peter jackson seems to have forgot that he directed bad taste? I've seen most of the footage on both Fellowship and Towers but I've not heard it mentioned once.. MMMmmm wonder why?

**Thrush** · 3rd February 2004

bad taste? Is that a porno or something ?

**Novecento** · 4th February 2004

Bad Taste is one of the first movies Peter directed. Not much of a story and special effects that aren't as good as you'd expect them to be, but as for a b-movie, it's one of the best splatter flicks I've ever seen.

Check: http://tbhl.theonering.net/films/bad_taste.html

Nove

**gunner** · 4th February 2004

Bad Taste and Braindead are both classics, a bit different in terms of budget and effects to LOTR!

**wocK_** · 5th February 2004

Originally Posted by Mr.James

Kil Bill v1 was the best film of 2003 by far. he's the only director with any original ideas and style nowadays

No it wasn't the matrix films were great as was the rotk :>

**Thrush** · 9th February 2004

I was impressed with Kill Bill only having just watched it.... But i spit on the third Matrix film as it was total tripe... I wouldn't even feed it to my dog