Close

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    DF Admin 4me2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    33,090
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked:        2,033
    Karma Level
    2254

    Attention F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble



    The Formula 1 Commission is set to be asked to consider switching the sport's future engines to 1.6-litre V6 turbos in a bid to end the ongoing stalemate about future regulations, AUTOSPORT has learned.


    Ahead of a crunch meeting in London today to discuss engine regulations for 2013, amid disagreement between manufacturers over plans to move to 1.6-litre four-cylinder engines, it is understood that a final push has been made by the car makers to find a solution that is acceptable to all the sport's stakeholders.
    Sources have revealed that those behind-the-scenes discussions between the engine manufacturers have resulted in a plan for the four-cylinder plans to be dropped and instead 1.6-litre V6s to come into force from 2014 - one year later than the current change in regulations is planned to come into force.
    With the support of all the car makers, there is no reason why the teams would be against such a tweak to the engine regulations - especially as it would guarantee all the current manufacturers staying in the sport.
    And crucially for the FIA and its president Jean Todt, who has been adamant that F1 has to move to more environmentally-friendly rules, the plan includes sticking to the 'green' KERS technologies that were originally planned for the four-cylinder power units.
    The FIA said earlier this month that it would be willing to hold off the switch the four-cylinder engines if there was unanimous support of the competitors.
    If the V6 plan is received positively by the F1 Commission then it would go to the FIA's World Motor Sport Council for approval.

    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/92510
    There are 3 types of people in the world - those who make things happen, those who watch things happen; and those who wondered what happened.

    http://newsarse.com/

    Conservatives. Putting the 'N' into Cuts.


  2. #2
    DF VIP Member
    pumpman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    tv land
    Posts
    1,559
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked:        39
    Karma Level
    423

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/form...e/13878359.stm

    Formula 1 bosses have agreed to delay the introduction of new 'green' engines by a year until 2014.
    The move comes after opposition to the early switch to 1.6-litre turbo engines fitted with extensive hybrid technology from the current 2.4-litre V8s.
    As part of the compromise, the new engine formula will be for six-cylinder engines rather than the four-cylinder units that were originally agreed.
    That is a sop to Ferrari, who objected to the restriction to four cylinders.
    The sport's longest-serving and most powerful team had objected because the restriction had no relevance to any of their road cars.
    The changes to the rules, which were agreed at a meeting of the F1 Commission on Wednesday, must be approved in a fax vote of the World Council of governing body, the FIA, on Monday.
    This is expected to be a formality, even though F1 commercial boss, Bernie Ecclestone, - who sits on both the F1 Commission and the World Council - favours the retention of the current normally aspirated engines.
    The rules were originally voted through by the World Council last December, but in the intervening months, considerable opposition within F1 became clear.
    Of the current engine manufacturers, only Renault were completely in favour. Ferrari objected to the restriction to four cylinders, and Mercedes were concerned about the speed of the introduction of the rules.
    F1 ENGINE RULES FROM 2014

    Continue reading the main story
    • 1.6-litre, four-cylinder turbos with energy recovery and fuel restrictions to replace current 2.4-litre normally aspirated V8s
    • Fuel efficiency to increase by 35%
    • Maximum revs of 12,000rpm
    • Power of energy-recovery systems to double
    • Overall power to remain at approx 750bhp
    • Checks and balances to ensure costs are contained and performance across all engines remains comparable
    • Plan for advanced 'compound' turbos to be introduced in subsequent years

    The debate was made more difficult because Renault made clear that it would consider quitting F1 unless the new rules were introduced - the French company is planning for three-quarters of its road-car engines to be small-capacity turbo-hybrids by 2015.
    This new rule is a compromise that takes each party's view into account.
    The change in cylinder numbers and the one-year delay are the only significant changes to the new rules to have been agreed, according to sources at the FIA.
    The new engines will remain single-turbo units, with much more extensive use of energy recovery than exists with the 'Kers' units this year.
    The new rules have been pushed by FIA president Jean Todt, who wants F1 to embrace sustainability and be more road-relevant in the future.
    The aim is to make the cars use a third less fuel than they do at the moment and to improve the efficiency of F1 engines by as much as 35%, as well as to popularise hybrid and other energy-efficient technologies to speed up their adoption in road cars.
    The hope is that the adoption of the new rules will insulate the sport from charges of wastefulness at a time when supplies of fossil fuels are diminishing and there is pressure for the world to cut its production of greenhouse gases.
    Developments such as energy recovery are being increasingly implemented by road-car manufacturers.
    But the hope is that by using them in F1, these technologies will become 'sexy' and be used more widely, in the same way as semi-automatic gearboxes have since their invention by Ferrari in F1 in 1989.
    Care has been taken to ensure the performance of cars will not be affected and total power outputs will remain at current levels - approximately 750bhp. The new engines will not run at more than 12,000 revs per minute - current F1 engines spin at 18,000rpm.
    By adopting the regulations, F1 hopes to widen its appeal to sponsors - commercial insiders say some companies are reluctant to get involved in F1 because of its image of being wasteful with resources.
    A series of checks and balances have been written into the regulations to keep costs down and to ensure it should be impossible for one manufacturer to steal a march on the others in terms of performance.
    This will primarily be done through resource restriction, such as limiting the amount of people or time that can be devoted to a project.
    About 600bhp of the 750bhp produced by the engines will come from the four-cylinder single-turbo engine itself, with the rest being provided by energy storage and power-boost systems.
    These systems - currently known in F1 as Kers but more widely referred to as hybrids - were first used in F1 in 2009 before being abandoned for 2010, and are being reintroduced next season.
    For 2013, the power capacity of the Kers systems will be increased from 60kw to 120kw.
    Fuel consumption will be restricted both by limiting fuel flow and introducing a maximum capacity for races.
    In subsequent years, complex new turbocharging technology called compounding may be introduced to further enhance efficiency.
    The regulations have been framed to encourage the pursuit of efficiency in engine design, dramatically increasing the amount of power that can be produced per litre of fuel burnt.

  3. #3
    DF VIP Member
    Mobileman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    No.1 The Toon
    Posts
    6,435
    Thanks
    1,624
    Thanked:        1,045
    Karma Level
    733

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    this is bollocks, IMO F1 needs 3.5-Litre twin turbos

  4. #4
    DF VIP Member
    Tim.Lad's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    The Badlands
    Posts
    2,066
    Thanks
    343
    Thanked:        244
    Karma Level
    403

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    I`m totally fed up with motor sport trying to be green its pointless if you want motor sport to be green just don't bother turning up, they harp on about economical engines and kers, but fuck me do you see how much rubber is left on the track at the end of a race, fuel that is burnt, Co2 released due to travel and manufacturing F1 is supposed to be the cream of motor sport and much as they would like us to believe you can not go racing and be green at the same time..

    2 Thanks given to Tim.Lad

    Jack-daniels (24th June 2011),  rugrat (23rd June 2011)  


  5. #5
    DF VIP Member Godscrasher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    1,550
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked:        31
    Karma Level
    362

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    Yeah but for the rest of the worlds cars to be green and run on birds shit, F1 needs to be the starting point for all future related car technology. If they don't do this then the car manufacturing world will pick up technology at a slow rate.

    But I sort of agree, bring on the big 3.0 twin turbos

  6. #6
    DF VIP Member
    pratman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    UK midlands
    Posts
    2,216
    Thanks
    101
    Thanked:        223
    Karma Level
    364

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    Quote Originally Posted by Mobileman View Post
    this is bollocks, IMO F1 needs 3.5-Litre twin turbos
    LOVE IT lol, W12 engines would be nice lol, i thought this is meant to be the creme de la creme of motor sport so it should be allowed to go wild.

  7. #7
    DF Admin 4me2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    33,090
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked:        2,033
    Karma Level
    2254

    Default Re: F1 considers move to V6 turbos By Jonathan Noble

    Formula 1 bosses confirm engines will not change until 2014

    Formula 1 bosses have confirmed a deal to delay the introduction of new 'green' engines by a year until 2014.
    The decision to switch from four-cylinder 1.6-litre engines introduced in 2013 to V6s of the same size a year later was made by F1 bosses last week.
    It was rubber-stamped on Monday by a vote of the FIA's world council, the legislature of F1's governing body.
    The maximum rev limit of the engines will be increased to 15,000 from 12,000 to allay concerns about the spectacle.
    F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone has been against the switch to the new engines from the current 2.4-litre normally aspirated V8s, claiming that they will make a less dramatic noise and therefore be less exciting to watch.
    It has emerged that many of the circuits that host grands prix have made clear to the FIA their concerns that the switch could result in a drop in spectator numbers, their only source of income.


    The decision to increase the rev limit was made on Thursday after the FIA received a letter from some of the F1 tracks expressing their concerns.
    It was the latest compromise over the introduction of these rules, which were initially agreed by the world council last December.
    Then, the plan was to introduce in 2013 four-cylinder engines with a maximum rev limit of 12,000, fitted with extensive hybrid technology.
    But only Renault of F1's current engine manufacturers were fully behind the rules and a period of negotiations began.
    The switch to V6s was partly at the behest of Ferrari, who objected to the restriction to four cylinders.
    The sport's longest-serving and most powerful team had objected because the restriction had no relevance to any of their road cars.
    The debate was made more difficult because Renault made clear that it would consider quitting F1 unless the new rules were introduced - the French company is planning for three-quarters of its road-car engines to be small-capacity turbo-hybrids by 2015.


    This new rule, which requires engines to be in a V6 configuration, is a compromise that takes each party's view into account.
    The decision to limit the engine configuration to a V6 rather than stipulate a six-cylinder maximum and leave it up to individual manufacturers to decide the number of cylinders and layout, was made in a bid to keep costs under control and as a way to ensure engine performance remains as equal as possible.
    The new engines will remain single-turbo units, with much more extensive use of energy recovery than exists with the 'Kers' units this year.
    The new rules have been pushed by FIA president Jean Todt, who wants F1 to embrace sustainability and be more road-relevant in the future.
    The aim is to improve the efficiency of F1 engines by as much as 35%, as well as to popularise hybrid and other energy-efficient technologies to speed up their adoption in road cars.
    The hope is that the adoption of the new rules will insulate the sport from charges of wastefulness at a time when supplies of fossil fuels are diminishing and there is pressure for the world to cut its production of greenhouse gases.



    Developments such as energy recovery are being increasingly implemented by road-car manufacturers.
    But the hope is that by using them in F1, these technologies will become 'sexy' and be used more widely, in the same way as semi-automatic gearboxes have since their invention by Ferrari in F1 in 1989.
    Care has been taken to ensure the performance of cars will not be affected and total power outputs will remain at current levels - approximately 750bhp.
    By adopting the regulations, F1 hopes to widen its appeal to sponsors - commercial insiders say some companies are reluctant to get involved in F1 because of its image of being wasteful with resources.
    A series of checks and balances have been written into the regulations to keep costs down and to ensure it should be impossible for one manufacturer to steal a march on the others in terms of performance.
    This will primarily be done through resource restriction, such as limiting the amount of people or time that can be devoted to a project.
    About 600bhp of the 750bhp produced by the engines will come from the six-cylinder single-turbo engine itself, with the rest being provided by energy storage and power-boost systems.
    These systems - currently known in F1 as Kers but more widely referred to as hybrids - were first used in F1 in 2009 before being abandoned for 2010, and were reintroduced this season.
    For 2014, the power capacity of the Kers systems will be increased from 60kw to 120kw.


    Fuel consumption will be restricted both by limiting fuel flow and introducing a maximum capacity for races.
    In subsequent years, complex new turbocharging technology called compounding may be introduced to further enhance efficiency.
    The regulations have been framed to encourage the pursuit of efficiency in engine design, dramatically increasing the amount of power that can be produced per litre of fuel burn

    F1 ENGINE RULES FROM 2014

    • 1.6-litre, six-cylinder turbos with energy recovery and fuel restrictions to replace current 2.4-litre normally aspirated V8s
    • Fuel efficiency to increase by 35%
    • Maximum revs of 15,000rpm
    • Power of energy-recovery systems to double
    • Overall power to remain at approx 750bhp
    • Checks and balances to ensure costs are contained and performance across all engines remains comparable
    • Plan for advanced 'compound' turbos to be introduced in subsequent years



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/form...e/13878359.stm
    There are 3 types of people in the world - those who make things happen, those who watch things happen; and those who wondered what happened.

    http://newsarse.com/

    Conservatives. Putting the 'N' into Cuts.


Similar Threads

  1. Graham Taylor considers resigning!
    By clarky in forum Football
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29th October 2002, 06:17 PM
  2. NTL's 512kbps move to 600kbps for FREE
    By EUPHORiA in forum Internet Connections & VPNs
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 7th October 2002, 03:14 PM
  3. Quality move by Father Christmas
    By MajorFU in forum Football
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 7th October 2002, 09:20 AM
  4. XBOX to XBOX using Flash to move files
    By FTLOSM in forum Microsoft Consoles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2nd October 2002, 04:30 PM
  5. Humax support on the move(more inside)
    By quizzy in forum Digital Satellite TV
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 20th September 2002, 10:22 PM

Social Networking Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •