Close

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    DF VIP Member Deadly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,553
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked:        3
    Karma Level
    524

    Default Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    A million people could be taken off incapacity benefit and forced back to work as part of a Government overhaul of the welfare system.

    Tony Blair will join Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton in publishing the controversial and much-delayed proposals to cut the annual £12.6bn bill. They will say "perverse incentives" are encouraging one million claimants to stay on the dole and out of work.

    The benefit is also to be renamed amid fears the term "incapacity" makes it seem those on it have no hope of working again.

    Doctors may be offered financial incentives to encourage them to sign off less people long-term sick and encourage them back to employment instead.

    The plans will provide another test of the Prime Minister's ability to get crucial reforms past his own backbenchers.

    Means testing, time limiting eligibility for benefits and making payments in training vouchers rather than cash are all "tough" measures which have faced heavy criticism.

    Under the "something for something" regime, those on incapacity benefit will be given more help to return to work but face payment cuts if they do not take advantage of it.

    Incapacity benefit is currently paid at a rate of £57.65 a week for new claimants. In many cases that rises to £68.20 after six months and £76.45 after a year.

    Under the Government's plans, benefits will be docked by as much as £10.93 a week for refusing to attend a work interview and £21.86 for a second refusal.

    The "perverse incentives" identified include the fact that the benefit becomes more valuable over time and can be cut if claimants do take on training or voluntary work.

    The TUC has accepted the "clear" need for reform but has warned that claimants should not be presumed to be cheats or "coerced" into getting work.


    Source - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/24012006/14...its-shake.html

  2. #2
    DF VIP Member elephantsoup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    jebrovia
    Posts
    3,061
    Thanks
    805
    Thanked:        193
    Karma Level
    520

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Saw that on news this morning. Was a report from some town where 1 in 5 were on incapacity benefit or the likes. While I am all in favour of a decent social welfare system this surely is taking the piss, with this in mind I would give a guarded welcome to any Govt initiative which does weed out those who are scamming the system.

    Regards

    Elephantsoup

  3. #3
    DF VIP Member
    kracken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Eutelsat W3 7E
    Posts
    6,793
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked:        74
    Karma Level
    1041

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Benefit for all those that deserve it , not the scrounging twats who dont .Get off your arse and get a job !!!

  4. #4
    DF VIP Member Zippeyrude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,317
    Thanks
    238
    Thanked:        792
    Karma Level
    535

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Ahhh, finally some of the tossers who do central government maths realise that the working population should not subsidise the lazy fookers who can work but choose not to.

    If it were my policy i'd friggin burn the lot of em in a special 'recycling power station', less scroungers, less wasted on benefits, more for teachers, nurses, police, pensions, etc. It all makes sense.

    Burning the scammers would produce heat, the energy produced could heat hospitals, schools and the homes of pensioners who fought for this country and freedoms but who pay tax on heating.

    Long live the revolution.

  5. #5
    DF Admin 4me2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    33,090
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked:        2,033
    Karma Level
    2254

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>Hutton unveils benefits shake-up

    </TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IBOX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=208 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=5></TD><TD class=sibtbg>

    <!-- S IMED -->Hutton statement
    <!-- E IMED -->

    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IBOX --><!-- S SF -->Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton has unveiled plans to get one million incapacity benefit claimants back into work, saving £7bn a year.
    The more severely disabled people will receive a higher rate of benefit and have no obligation to look for work.
    But claimants who refuse to take part in back-to-work schemes risk losing part of their benefits, Mr Hutton said.
    There will also be moves to get a million older people and 300,000 single parents back into work, he said. <!-- E SF -->
    Employment rate
    About 2.7m people currently claim incapacity benefit, resulting in an annual bill of £12.5bn. From 2008 it will be renamed the Employment and Support Allowance.
    If one million incapacity benefit claimants return to work, the country would move closer to Labour's ambition of an 80% employment rate, Mr Hutton said as he unveiled the Welfare Reform Green Paper.
    <!-- S IBOX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=208 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=5></TD><TD class=sibtbg> We are concerned that these proposals could disturb an often fragile balance, trigger relapse and worsen the symptoms and outcome


    Marjorie Wallace, Sane



    <!-- S ILIN -->Q&A: Incapacity benefit
    <!-- E ILIN --><!-- S ILIN -->Send us your comments
    <!-- E ILIN -->
    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IBOX -->
    The measures include the UK-wide roll-out of the Pathways to Work initiative, currently being tested in seven regions.
    The idea is to give individual counselling, training and advice to sick and disabled people to help them back to work.
    It will be compulsory for claimants assessed as able to work to take part in these schemes.
    Those who refuse to take part could lose as much as £10.93 a week in payments, rising to £21.86 for a second refusal.
    Mr Hutton told MPs the aim was to reduce the number of new claimants, to provide greater help to those on the benefit to return to work, and to give more support to the most severely sick and disabled.
    'Fair' proposals
    Other measures include, in a month's time, the hiring of employment advisers by GP surgeries as part of a trial scheme to help sick people return to work.
    Health staff who help to keep people in work while they were ill, or assist them to return to a job, will be rewarded, under the proposals.
    <!-- S IBOX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=208 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=5></TD><TD class=sibtbg> There is a long way to go to eradicate negative attitudes about the ability or willingness of the long term sick to work






    <!-- S ILIN -->How the government is trying to get claimants into work
    <!-- E ILIN --><!-- S ILIN -->Welfare reforms at-a-glance
    <!-- E ILIN -->
    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IBOX -->
    "Our proposals will be fair to claimants and fair to taxpayers," said Mr Hutton.
    "Nine out of 10 people who came on to incapacity benefit expect to get back into work, yet if you have been on incapacity benefit for more than two years, you are more likely to retire or die than ever get another job. That cannot be right."
    A third of new claimants now cite mental health problems as the reason for coming on to benefits, he said.
    <!-- S IBOX --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=208 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=5></TD><TD class=sibtbg>WHAT IS A GREEN PAPER?
    It is a consultation document containing policy proposals for debate before a decision is taken on the best policy option
    It contains several alternative policy options
    After the consultation, ministers normally publish firm recommendations in a White Paper, which may then be put before MPs in the form of a Bill
    It is thought the government wants to get the welfare reforms into a published bill and through Parliament by the end of November

    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IBOX -->
    Lone parents whose youngest child is at least 11 will be required to attend interviews every three months, while those on benefit for a year will have to visit a jobs adviser every six months.
    Shadow work and pensions secretary Philip Hammond said that, while the Conservatives broadly welcomed the thrust of the policies, much of it had been heard before without any government action.
    David Laws, the Liberal Democrat work and pensions spokesman, said setting targets was "the easy part" and that the "test" would be whether the reforms delivered in the long run.
    TUC general secretary Brendan Barber gave a "guarded welcome" to the plans, but said he had "real concerns" about how they will work in detail.
    Lorna Reith, of the Disability Benefits Consortium - which brings together a number of leading disability groups and health charities - said she was concerned about the sanctions contained in the proposals.
    She urged ministers to concentrate on preventing people from being pushed out of the labour market in the first place. Mr Blair is trying to win over Labour MPs concerned about the changes. Sixty-five backbenchers rebelled against planned reforms to the benefit in 1999.<!-- E BO -->


    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4641588.stm
    There are 3 types of people in the world - those who make things happen, those who watch things happen; and those who wondered what happened.

    http://newsarse.com/

    Conservatives. Putting the 'N' into Cuts.


  6. #6
    DF VIP Member Deadly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    3,553
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked:        3
    Karma Level
    524

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippeyrude
    Ahhh, finally some of the tossers who do central government maths realise that the working population should not subsidise the lazy fookers who can work but choose not to.

    If it were my policy i'd friggin burn the lot of em in a special 'recycling power station', less scroungers, less wasted on benefits, more for teachers, nurses, police, pensions, etc. It all makes sense.

    Burning the scammers would produce heat, the energy produced could heat hospitals, schools and the homes of pensioners who fought for this country and freedoms but who pay tax on heating.

    Long live the revolution.
    Have you ever heard of this guy called Hitler? burned a few people...you might get some tips from him lol

  7. #7
    DF VIP Member burner1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South West
    Posts
    7,570
    Thanks
    329
    Thanked:        676
    Karma Level
    1214

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    I'm all for a fair system and people who deserve the benefits, but when I think about it, every person I know who are claiming incapacity benefit are scamming it in one way or another. Hopefully this sort of move will wipe the smirk off their faces. My mate lost his legs in the Falklands conflict and although he was pensioned off, he has never gone a day without being employed in one way or another and I think if he can contribute to society, a lot of people claiming can do the same.
    "An evil exists that threatens every man, woman, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland." - Adolf Hitler, 1933

  8. #8
    DF VIP Member wiggi28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    xanadu
    Posts
    3,038
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked:        4
    Karma Level
    516

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    does anybody actually know somebody who really deserves their incapacity benefit ?
    as burner says most of the people i know claiming are scamming it in one way or another .

  9. #9
    DF VIP Member mysterym's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    90210
    Posts
    1,615
    Thanks
    70
    Thanked:        59
    Karma Level
    346

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    There are way too many scroungers who are capable of working but prefer living on welfare. If they can weed them out and give them a kick in the ass then i'm all for it. For the people that can't genuinely work then the state system must support them without fail.

    Fucked off with paying more and more taxes and having more and more stress at work when the most pressure that some twats have is waiting for there dole money so they can get pissed at the end of the week. You can call me heartless if you like, but i've worked hard for the last 10 years without taking a penny from the goverment.

  10. #10
    DF VIP Member
    DelTrotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    GoodoleEngland
    Posts
    3,013
    Thanks
    268
    Thanked:        329
    Karma Level
    461

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Only the dregs of society are happy being on the dole, having a fivers sput a night, eating smartprice goods and watching channel 5. Let em be i say you wouldnt want them in a Working environment
    "Your proposition may be good. But let's have one thing understood
    Whatever it is, I'm against it! And even when you've changed it Or condensed it
    I'm against it!"
    A top man

  11. #11
    DF VIP Member MercuryRises's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    2,208
    Thanks
    45
    Thanked:        24
    Karma Level
    405

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    Quote Originally Posted by DelTrotter
    Only the dregs of society are happy being on the dole, having a fivers sput a night, eating smartprice goods and watching channel 5. Let em be i say you wouldnt want them in a Working environment

    As may be. But I don't wanna pay to keep the lazy cunts either
    Drinkin' beer in the hot sun
    I fought the law and I won
    I fought the law and I won

  12. #12
    DF VIP Member
    DelTrotter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    GoodoleEngland
    Posts
    3,013
    Thanks
    268
    Thanked:        329
    Karma Level
    461

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    But I don't wanna pay to keep the lazy cunts either
    What shall be done to these people?
    Any measure extreme would be seen as too harsh and wouldn't be implemented as the Left wouldnt except this.
    I know a few friends who just dont wanna work and they laugh at all this New deal Bollox
    "Your proposition may be good. But let's have one thing understood
    Whatever it is, I'm against it! And even when you've changed it Or condensed it
    I'm against it!"
    A top man

  13. #13
    DF VIP Member BertRoot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Poppy Fields
    Posts
    23,955
    Thanks
    1,038
    Thanked:        2,059
    Karma Level
    2513

    Default Re: Thousands to lose benefits in shake-up

    There are plenty out there living it up at my expense. Makes me sick. Those who put it on when outside the house should be crippled and then disallowed benefit.

    Sympathetic quacks also make me sick. They seem happy to spunk more of their tax to these scrounging layabouts.


Similar Threads

  1. Leaves united lose another
    By ABCMan in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31st January 2003, 09:49 PM
  2. 2-1, You always lose 2-1
    By MajorFU in forum Football
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 1st November 2002, 05:20 AM
  3. Scum lose 1.0
    By sanjuro in forum Football
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 28th August 2002, 08:43 PM
  4. will the scum lose tonight ?
    By sanjuro in forum Football
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 28th August 2002, 08:40 PM

Social Networking Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •