Teacher 'sent girl explicit film'

[Mule]

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=629 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD colSpan=3>Teacher 'sent girl explicit film'


</TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=416><!-- S BO --><!-- S IIMA --><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=203 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD> Mr Riley is a former head of sixth form at Baines High School

</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- E IIMA --><!-- S SF -->A teenager has told a court how her former teacher sent her a video of himself undressing before they had sex.


Andrew Riley, 36, of Wentworth Drive, Lancaster, is former head of sixth form at Baines High School in Poulton.

Preston Crown Court also heard how the girl performed a sex act on Mr Riley as he drove the school minibus.

The married father-of-two denies two counts of an abuse of trust and sexual activity with a child and a single count of offering to supply coca1ne.
<!-- E SF -->
The court heard how Mr Riley twice took the girl to hotels in Manchester and, after drinking champagne, offered her coca1ne before they had sex.

'Topless photograph'

Mr Riley denies having any sexual activity with the girl but admits spending nights in a hotel with her.

The girl told the jury they took drugs on both nights at the hotel.

She said: "I'd gone to the toilet and he'd put the coca1ne out in lines on the desk that was in the hotel room. Then Andrew did a line or two."

When asked if she had taken any, she replied: "Yes."

Speaking of the video he allegedly sent her, she said: "It was a video of him removing his boxers, from the front."

He had sent her the video after she sent him a photograph of herself topless.

Mr Watson, prosecuting, said Mr Riley sent her a message saying: "Can you believe you have got a video of the head of your year getting his shorts off?"

The girl allegedly wrote back saying "Trust me", to which he replied: "I have to because you could get me locked up."

The relationship cooled after the girl went away to study, and she eventually showed her old school the email messages.

The police were then called in.
The trial continues.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/l...re/7001254.stm

[mij]

If true? Only castration is good enough.

[Mickey]

If true? Only castration is good enough.

dont be so conservative


hang the bstard if true
i hate this when some one in trust of juniors can do this

[Tr1xerb3ll]

lets be honest here this girl doesnt sound like a shrinking voilet does she ??? she was willing flashing her tits at him, went to hotels, agreed to underage sex and took drugs , i'm sorry yes he should of refused her or not advanced her but i dont think this girl is entirely a victim it seems more like a stupid kid who is taking revenge for being dumped, or her parents found out and forced the issue!, And i can say this is local knowledge of bains - girls have skirts on knicker lines and boobs that point out further than school books.

[Mickey]

lets be honest here this girl doesnt sound like a shrinking voilet does she ??? she was willing flashing her tits at him, went to hotels, agreed to underage sex and took drugs , i'm sorry yes he should of refused her or not advanced her but i dont think this girl is entirely a victim it seems more like a stupid kid who is taking revenge for being dumped, or her parents found out and forced the issue!, And i can say this is local knowledge of bains - girls have skirts on knicker lines and boobs that point out further than school books.

Have you received "our" latest video yet honey

[wonkyfox]

"Once she went away to study, the relationship cooled off"

Meaning.....she reached 16, pissed off to college, and when he knocked her back, she decides to fuck his kiddy fiddling arse up!!!

They sound as bad as each other..although he should know better!

[DB]

Both sides to this are suspect, but one thing is for sure, this cunt needs chemically castrating and put in a room full of grieving parents for an hour.

He's a paedophile plain and simple praying on children. What makes it worse is the profession he has chosen, was this a calculated decision......the cunt !!!!

[GameKing]

it doesn`t say how old the girl is, if she was his pupil and he was a former head of sixth form, then she would be 17 or 18, therefore legal, not morally O.K but stlll legal.

[Fusen]

yeah was in sixth form so she would be doing it with consent, it's just that it's the whole using your position as a teacher to get it on and so braking the whole trust shit

tbh, she sounds like she was leading it on as much as he was doing it...

also, try and deny the fact that if a 17/18 year old girl who was fit came up to you when you were in your 30's you would say no?

I know I sure as hell couldn't...

if it was a 17/18 year old boy with a 30 year old women, I doubt you'd all be saying she should be hung

[Robbo]

I wish they would show pictures of the girl, so unfair!

[super mike]

yeah was in sixth form so she would be doing it with consent, it's just that it's the whole using your position as a teacher to get it on and so braking the whole trust shit

tbh, she sounds like she was leading it on as much as he was doing it...

also, try and deny the fact that if a 17/18 year old girl who was fit came up to you when you were in your 30's you would say no?

I know I sure as hell couldn't...

if it was a 17/18 year old boy with a 30 year old women, I doubt you'd all be saying she should be hung

Spot on.

He should have known better, and so should she.

She knew full well what she was doing, and obviously consented.

[lithho]

I wish they would show pictures of the girl, so unfair!

[yankee]

I read this in the Metro the other day.. I'm sure I read she was 18 at the time of the incidents. If so it's not so bad really is it.. fair enough a teacher shouldn't really get with his pupils, but at the end of the day she's old enough to make her own choices.

[MsDG]

errrmmm... I think you are all getting confused here.

The teacher was only the head of 6th form (which I take to mean there is another 5 years below in that school).

the girl must have been under 16 because he wouldn't be in court facing charges of...
abuse of trust and sexual activity with a child.

You wouldn't be in court for that if she was over 16, you would just be facing disciplinary action.

[super mike]

Fair enough, but she still knew full well what she was doing. He is just a bigger cunt

[Fusen]

errrmmm... I think you are all getting confused here.

The teacher was only the head of 6th form (which I take to mean there is another 5 years below in that school).

the girl must have been under 16 because he wouldn't be in court facing charges of...
abuse of trust and sexual activity with a child.

You wouldn't be in court for that if she was over 16, you would just be facing disciplinary action.

The married father-of-two also took the 18-year-old to hotels, gave her champagne and offered her coca1ne before having “amazing” sex with her, Preston Crown Court was told.

you'd get much worse offences than "abuse of trust" if you fuck a student under 16 :X

edit;

also another quote -

"The jury heard that the girl felt hurt and 'cast aside' when the married father-of-two ended their relationship when she went to university in October 2005."

clearly she's done it to get back at him

[yankee]

it's a load of bollocks, he should be allowed to resign and that be the end of it. at most he should face only the coca1ne charges. he didn't abuse any trust here.. she willingly stayed at the hotel with him. too many times do girls cry rape when shunned.. this in my eyes is just another example of that.

[Tammer]

well, seeing as she was 18 at the time of it, I think we need to see the topless picture as evidence.

TBH, there is the abuse of trust issue, but on the other hand, if some hot 18 yr old is gagging for it how many of you would tuck your semi back in its trousers...teacher or no teacher!

If it turns out she was under-age, then i rescind the above